PL EN SV
Case Study

Saving a hotel development threatened with demolition

icon
Hotel development
icon
Northern
Poland
Project type
Hotel
coastal location
Challenge
Critical issues
technological, organizational, and logistical
Outcome
Project saved
without the need for demolition
Project Summary
icon
Situation
The hotel project had reached a critical stage. The main contractor withdrew from the construction site, while numerous execution and organizational errors resulted in the loss of control over the investment process. The project faced the risk of demolishing completed structures and causing substantial financial losses for the investor.
icon
PROCEEDS' Role
We assessed the condition of the investment, identified execution errors, developed corrective scenarios, and assumed responsibility for managing the next stages of the project. PROCEEDS supported the investor in restoring technical, organizational, and decision-making control.
icon
Outcome
The existing structure was preserved, demolition was avoided, investor losses were minimized, and the project was successfully completed with a controlled budget increase compared to the original assumptions.
Key Challenges
icon
Critical construction errors
Major issues originating from earlier stages of project execution.
icon
Withdrawal of the main contractor
No responsible party remained to continue managing the project.
icon
Risk of demolition
Several engineering assessments indicated demolition as the most viable solution.
icon
Loss of process control
Lack of effective organizational and technological coordination.
icon
High financial risk
The investment was exposed to potentially severe financial losses.
icon
Urgent decision-making
The project required immediate reorganization and the implementation of a new delivery model.
What we did
01

Technical and organizational assessment

Evaluated the true extent of technological and organizational issues.

02

Structural verification

Confirmed that the existing structure could be safely retained.

03

Alternative technical solutions

Developed alternatives to the original project assumptions.

04

Process reorganization

Restructured the project management process and coordinated the implementation of corrective measures.

05

Project control

Took responsibility for the continued management of the investment and implemented a secure model for project continuation.

06

Project completion

Successfully delivered the project to full operational readiness.

Results
result
Project results
  • Preserved the existing building structure
  • Avoided costly demolition
  • Minimized investor losses
  • Continued project execution
  • Successfully completed the investment
  • Preserved the property's commercial value
  • Established the foundation for a long-term partnership with the investor
”Some investment projects require more than successful execution—they require restoring control over their future.
Complex projects require the right direction.
Let's talk about your investment.
Contact Us
Explore Our Other Case Studies
case study
Reorganizing an International Investment Process During a Global Crisis
View Case Study
case study
Relocating a Modular Campus Instead of Costly Demolition
View Case Study
Let's discuss your project

Get in touch if your project is not progressing as you expected. Let us help you get it back on track.

If you prefer to talk by phone, call us at +48 536 410 102

* Required fields